- Liittynyt
- 07.02.2017
- Viestejä
- 2 393
Juuri näin. Sillä erotuksella tietysti, että tämän kun nyt tietää niin ei oikein osaa luottaa juuri mihinkään ilman tarkistusta.
Joku mainitsi aiemmin noista geminin pänvastaisista vastauksista eri kerroilla. Tuossa ylemmässä ajoleikkuriesimerkissäni Gemini tuntuu olevan täysin sekaisin. Ihan ajankohdasta riippuen se antaa täysin päinvastaisia tietoja. Eikä pelkästään siitä onko kyseinen malli tuotannossa vai ei, mutta se sotkee myös muita malleja käsittämättömän virheellisesti sekaan. Ainoa logiikka on, että samassa vastauksessa nämä virheelliset, aivan höpöä olevat lisäväittämät tukevat "virheellistä päävastausta" ja saavat sen kuullostamaan entistäkin vakuuttavammalta. Aivan kuten lahjakas valehtelija se kehittää uskottavaa tarinaa valheen ympärille.
Sen verran uutta tämä kaikki, että en tiedä miten näihin "kuuluisi" suhtautua. Jatkaa keskustelua ja todeta ai:lle että päätelmäsi tai väitteesi ovat ihan roskaa? vai oikaista sitä niiltä osin antamalla oikeat tiedot tarjottimella?
edit: kävin läpi tuon "thinking" vaiheen...
Analyzing Consistency of Specs
I've confirmed the Husqvarna R 112C's engine specs have held steady. Further, my investigation into the model's key components shows a remarkable persistence of the initial design elements. This offers a robust foundation for my further analysis.
Exploring R 112C Variations
I'm now delving into the nuances between the R 112C and the R 112C5, which emerged after confirming the base model's consistency. The evidence hints at model designation changes over time, with potential feature differences. I'm noting conflicting data about the collector on the R 112C5. Operator's manual and Hintaopas sites mention it, which contrasts with the usual BioClip setup.
Investigating Model Discrepancies
My focus has shifted toward verifying the differences between the R 112C and R 112C5 models, confirming their respective production timelines, and identifying whether manufacturing year impacts their features. I've initiated several searches on the Husqvarna website and other official sources to locate archived model specs or press releases, and I've also extended the search to include user comparisons and reviews to gain more practical insights. I am now working to confirm the key differences discovered in my initial research and resolve the contradictions.
Pinpointing Key R 112C Differences
I'm now focusing on the exact differences between the R 112C and R 112C5, aiming for concrete details. I've initiated searches on the Husqvarna website and other official sources to locate archived model specifications or press releases. I am also planning to synthesize the technical data I've gathered to create a clear comparison. If this does not yield an answer, I'll build the most complete answer possible, acknowledging the unofficial timeline.
Synthesizing Model Data
I'm now synthesizing the data. I've uncovered R 112C/C5 differences and production year hints, but official confirmation remains elusive. My focus is on consolidating findings for a clear comparison. A final, targeted search for official Husqvarna info is planned before finalizing.
Confirming Official Data
I'm now focusing on a final, targeted search for official Husqvarna information, aiming to directly confirm the model differences and production timeline. I've prepared a focused query on the Husqvarna website, seeking archived model specifications or press releases. I plan to synthesize the technical data I've compiled, creating a clear comparison, even if official confirmation is elusive.
I've confirmed the Husqvarna R 112C's engine specs have held steady. Further, my investigation into the model's key components shows a remarkable persistence of the initial design elements. This offers a robust foundation for my further analysis.
Exploring R 112C Variations
I'm now delving into the nuances between the R 112C and the R 112C5, which emerged after confirming the base model's consistency. The evidence hints at model designation changes over time, with potential feature differences. I'm noting conflicting data about the collector on the R 112C5. Operator's manual and Hintaopas sites mention it, which contrasts with the usual BioClip setup.
Investigating Model Discrepancies
My focus has shifted toward verifying the differences between the R 112C and R 112C5 models, confirming their respective production timelines, and identifying whether manufacturing year impacts their features. I've initiated several searches on the Husqvarna website and other official sources to locate archived model specs or press releases, and I've also extended the search to include user comparisons and reviews to gain more practical insights. I am now working to confirm the key differences discovered in my initial research and resolve the contradictions.
Pinpointing Key R 112C Differences
I'm now focusing on the exact differences between the R 112C and R 112C5, aiming for concrete details. I've initiated searches on the Husqvarna website and other official sources to locate archived model specifications or press releases. I am also planning to synthesize the technical data I've gathered to create a clear comparison. If this does not yield an answer, I'll build the most complete answer possible, acknowledging the unofficial timeline.
Synthesizing Model Data
I'm now synthesizing the data. I've uncovered R 112C/C5 differences and production year hints, but official confirmation remains elusive. My focus is on consolidating findings for a clear comparison. A final, targeted search for official Husqvarna info is planned before finalizing.
Confirming Official Data
I'm now focusing on a final, targeted search for official Husqvarna information, aiming to directly confirm the model differences and production timeline. I've prepared a focused query on the Husqvarna website, seeking archived model specifications or press releases. I plan to synthesize the technical data I've compiled, creating a clear comparison, even if official confirmation is elusive.
